Dentition types in Neotropical snakes: Morphological adaptations and phylogenetic significance.
- Bryan Ramírez Castro
- Mar 3
- 2 min read
Updated: Mar 11
The dentition of Neotropical snakes reflects evolutionary adaptations to prey capture, venom delivery, and ecological niches. This review classifies dental morphology into four primary types, emphasizing their functional roles, phylogenetic distribution, and clinical relevance.
1. Aglyphous Dentition

Morphology:
◦ Homodont teeth, uniform in size and shape.
◦ Absence of specialized grooves or canals for venom delivery.
Function:
◦ Mechanical prey restraint (e.g., constriction in Boidae).
Taxonomic Examples:
◦ Boa imperialis(Boidae), Eunectes murinus (Boidae).
Ecological Role:
◦ Primarily feed on mammals, birds, and reptiles; critical for controlling mid-sized vertebrate populations.
2. Opisthoglyphous Dentition

Morphology:
◦Enlarged, grooved posterior maxillary teeth ("rear-fanged").
◦Duvernoy’s gland secretions (low-pressure venom system).
Function:
◦Envenomation via chewing (proteroglyphous-like delivery).
Taxonomic Examples:
◦Oxyrhopus petolarius (Dipsadidae), Leptodeira ornata(Dipsadidae).
Clinical Note:
◦Generally non-lethal to humans but may cause localized edema (e.g., Philodryas spp.).
3. Proteroglyphous Dentition

Morphology:
◦Fixed, hollow fangs at the anterior maxilla.
◦High-pressure venom glands (neurotoxic venom).
Function:
◦Rapid neurotoxic envenomation (prey immobilization).
Taxonomic Examples:
◦ Micruroides euryxanthusMicrurus spp. (Elapidae)
Ecological Role:
◦ Specialized predators of small vertebrates (e.g., snakes, lizards).
4. Solenoglyphous Dentition

Morphology:
◦ Long, retractable hollow fangs on rotating maxillae.
◦ High-pressure venom glands (hemotoxic or myotoxic venom).
Function:
◦ Deep tissue penetration and rapid venom delivery.
Taxonomic Examples:
◦ Bothrops asper (Viperidae), Crotalus durissus (Viperidae).
Clinical Significance:
◦ Responsible for >90% of snakebite envenomations in Latin America (e.g., coagulopathy, necrosis).
Comparative Analysis
Dentition Type | Fang Position | Venom System | Example Taxa | Venom Type |
Aglyphous | N/A | Absent | Boidae, Colubridae | Non-venomous |
Opisthoglyphous | Posterior | Low-pressure | Dipsadidae | Mild cytotoxins |
Proteroglyphous | Anterior | High-pressure | Elapidae | Neurotoxins (3FTx) |
Solenoglyphous | Anterior | High-pressure | Viperidae | Hemotoxins (SVMPs) |
Abbreviations: 3FTx = three-finger toxins; SVMPs = snake venom metalloproteinases.
Phylogenetic Context
◦ Viperidae (solenoglyphs) and Elapidae (proteroglyphs) represent convergent evolution of front-fanged venom systems.
◦ Dipsadidae (opisthoglyphs) exhibit high diversity in the Neotropics, reflecting adaptive radiation into invertebrate and amphibian prey niches.
Functional Morphology Insights
Tooth Replacement: Polyphyodont dentition in Viperidae ensures functional fang retention post-shedding.
Prey Specificity:
◦ Proteroglyphs (Elapidae) target neuromuscular junctions (α-neurotoxins).
◦ Solenoglyphs (Viperidae) disrupt hemostasis (thrombin-like enzymes).
Conservation and Clinical Implications
Habitat Loss: Viperids and Elapids are bioindicators of ecosystem health; their decline signals biodiversity erosion.
Antivenom Production: Venom variability in Bothrops spp. complicates antivenom efficacy (e.g., geographic venom variation).
Conclusion
The dentition of Neotropical snakes underscores the interplay between form, function, and ecology. Understanding these adaptations is critical for venom research, snakebite management, and conserving Neotropical herpetofauna.
References
Campbell, J. A., & Lamar, W. W. (2004). The Venomous Reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. Cornell University Press.
Vidal, N., et al. (2007). Molecular phylogeny of advanced snakes (Serpentes, Caenophidia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.
Warrell, D. A. (2010). Snake bite. The Lancet.
Comments